Best Peptide Stores

Documented, not alleged

Peptide Vendor Scam Alerts

This page lists 4 confirmed peptide-vendor closures and 3 documented FDA warning letters from 2024 through 2026, each linked to its public FDA, DOJ, or company source. We don't call a vendor a scam without a public enforcement or closure record behind it.

Closed and defunct vendors

Vendors confirmed shut down through a public source: a DOJ press release, a company's own closure notice, or credible contemporaneous reporting. Full detail and the complete source list for each is also covered in our 2025-2026 closure wave article.

Amino Asylum

Closed June 18, 2025

Closed

Federal authorities (FDA, coordinated with DOJ) physically raided Amino Asylum's Texas warehouse around June 18, 2025. Payment processing was cut and the website taken down immediately after, with no exit process established for customers or pending orders. The site has stayed dark since. The FDA had escalated enforcement across the research-chemical industry through 2024-2025, including warning letters to multiple vendors (Prime Peptides, Xcel Peptides, SwissChems, Summit Research in December 2024); the Amino Asylum raid marked a shift from administrative warnings to physical enforcement. Reported causes included ignoring prior FDA warning letters, marketing products for human consumption, selling prescription-only medications alongside peptides/SARMs, and using trademarked pharmaceutical brand names in marketing. In December 2025, founders Matthew Kawa and Jennifer Stechkober pleaded guilty to federal charges tied to SARMs products that were found to actually contain testosterone (a controlled substance). The same defendants and case were later associated with Kawa's earlier venture, Paradigm Peptides.

Known for: A Texas-based vendor known for aggressive pricing and a very wide catalog spanning peptides, SARMs, and nootropics; reportedly one of the top five most-searched peptide vendors in the US prior to the raid, with 400,000+ monthly site visitors.

Paradigm Peptides

Closed March 2024

Closed

Paradigm Peptides (operated by Matthew Kawa via 'Paradigm R.E. LLC' out of Michigan City, Indiana, with sister Jennifer Stechkober as an employee) shut down in March 2024 amid a federal investigation. Prosecutors alleged the business sold SARMs, hCG, and peptides as unapproved new drugs, falsely claimed FDA licensing/registration, falsely claimed US-lab manufacturing and quality testing when products were actually imported without testing from China, India, and elsewhere, and continued selling despite FDA warning letters in 2020 and 2022. From 2019-2024 the business reportedly sold to 54,000+ customers in all 50 states and 80+ countries, generating $5M in proceeds; some customers who ingested testosterone mislabeled as SARMs reported serious health effects. On December 10, 2025, Kawa and Stechkober pleaded guilty (United States v. Matthew Kawa, ND Indiana). Kawa was sentenced to nearly six years (70 months) in prison; Stechkober received 16 months.

Known for: Marketed itself as 'made in America' with 99% purity and third-party lab testing while prosecutors say it was actually importing untested products from Asia; now a cautionary case study cited across the industry (and referenced in the DOJ's Northern District of Indiana press release) for false US-manufacturing and false lab-testing claims by a peptide/SARMs vendor.

Peptide Sciences

Closed March 6, 2026

Closed

Long considered the largest US research peptide vendor, Peptide Sciences (Henderson, NV) voluntarily shut down without advance warning. On the day of closure, visitors to peptidesciences.com found only a brief statement announcing the company had decided to 'voluntarily shut down operations and discontinue the sale of our research products,' with no detail on outstanding orders or refunds. The closure followed 18 months of escalating federal enforcement across the research-peptide industry: a June 2025 FDA warehouse raid on a competitor, 50+ FDA warning letters industry-wide by September 2025, the proposed SAFE Drugs Act targeting research-chemical analogs of FDA-approved drugs, and an HHS announcement moving ~14 of 19 restricted peptides back to Category 1 (prescription-only via compounding pharmacies). Any site currently using the Peptide Sciences name/branding is confirmed fraudulent.

Known for: The largest and longest-running US research peptide vendor by revenue (an estimated $7.4M in online sales in December 2025 alone per Grips Intelligence), broad catalog, and being a default recommendation across the research-peptide community for over a decade before its abrupt shutdown.

Science.bio

Closed January 27, 2026

Closed

Science.bio, a well-regarded US supplier of research compounds, nootropics, and peptides, announced a voluntary, permanent closure with no advance warning, stating on its site: 'After careful consideration, Science.bio has made the decision to permanently close and discontinue the sale of research products.' Unlike Amino Asylum or Paradigm Peptides, Science.bio was not raided or criminally charged. The company chose to exit ahead of enforcement. It committed to fulfilling or fully refunding all outstanding orders. The closure was attributed to a convergence of pressures: 50+ FDA warning letters industry-wide (September 2025), physical raids on competitors (Amino Asylum, June 2025), criminal prosecutions (Paradigm Peptides, December 2025), payment processors increasingly restricting research-compound sales, ITC-driven import blocks on tirzepatide, and the proposed SAFE Drugs Act. The company warned that any site claiming to be a Science.bio successor is fraudulent, with no relaunch planned.

Known for: A well-regarded US supplier of research chemicals, nootropics, SARMs, and peptides known for a broad catalog and a relatively clean reputation prior to its voluntary closure: one of at least eight major vendors (alongside Peptide Sciences, Amino Asylum, Paradigm Peptides, Royal Research, and others) to exit the market in the ~9 months surrounding this closure.

Documented FDA warning letters

These companies have received a publicly posted FDA warning letter. Unlike the table above, we have not confirmed these vendors are closed. A warning letter is a formal notice of observed violations requiring a company response; it documents what the FDA cited, not a vendor's current operating status.

Prime Vitality, Inc. (dba Prime Peptides)

FDA warning letter issued December 10, 2024

FDA warning letter

The FDA reviewed primepeptides.co and issued a warning letter (MARCS-CMS 695156) stating that products sold on the site under the names "Semaglutide" and "Retatrutide" are unapproved new drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The letter states that despite "research purposes only" labeling, evidence from the website established the products are intended for human use. This letter was one of four issued the same day to separate companies (Prime Peptides, Xcel Peptides, SwissChems, and Summit Research) over GLP-1-class marketing.

Pinnacle Professional Research (dba Pinnacle Peptides)

FDA warning letter issued December 12, 2025

FDA warning letter

The FDA reviewed pinnaclepeptides.com and issued a warning letter (MARCS-CMS 719337) over the sale of SARM-labeled products, including items marketed as "SARM'S S4 ANDARINE," "LGD-4033," and "MK-2866," which the letter states are unapproved new drugs. The letter separately flags safety concerns tied to SARM-containing products, including reported liver toxicity and increased cardiovascular risk in people who have taken them.

SwissChems

FDA warning letter issued December 10, 2024

FDA warning letter

The FDA issued Warning Letter MARCS-CMS 695663 citing SwissChems' Semaglutide and Retatrutide product pages and related social media posts as marketing unapproved new drugs for human use. As of our most recent check, no FDA close-out letter had been published. We review SwissChems separately (status: caution) and cover this letter, plus mid-2026 reports of order and support disruption, in that full review.

Active caution signals

None of these signals alone proves a vendor is fraudulent. Together, or paired with a failed COA lookup, they're reason to slow down and verify before you buy. Full detail and sourcing for each signal is in our due-diligence red-flags checklist.

  • WatchA Certificate of Analysis published only in-house, or one that doesn't name an independent testing lab.
  • WatchPricing well below every comparable vendor's catalog on the same compounds.
  • WatchPositive reviews that trace back to the vendor's own marketing or affiliate content rather than independent, arm's-length coverage.
  • WatchBatch or lot numbers on a COA that don't map cleanly to the number on the actual vial.
  • WatchNo named founders, no physical business address, and no working phone number.
  • WatchA low score from an independent domain-trust or scam-check tool, especially paired with a young domain.

How to report a vendor

Neither of these agencies is us. We don't investigate vendors ourselves; we track and link public records once they exist.

FDA MedWatch

Report a suspected product-quality, contamination, or adverse-event problem tied to a peptide vendor's product directly to the FDA's safety reporting program.

Report to FDA MedWatch →

FTC ReportFraud.gov

Report suspected fraud, deceptive marketing claims, or an order that was never fulfilled or refunded to the Federal Trade Commission.

Report to FTC ReportFraud →

Frequently asked questions

Does a vendor listed here mean it's currently operating as a scam?+

No. The closures table lists vendors we can confirm, from a public source, actually shut down, and states the documented reason (a criminal case, a raid, or a voluntary exit). The FDA warning letter table lists companies the FDA has cited publicly; a warning letter is a formal notice of violations, not a finding that a company is currently fraudulent, and some of those companies may still be operating. Every entry links directly to its public source so you can read the primary record yourself.

How do you decide a vendor belongs on this page?+

Only two kinds of entries appear here: a vendor we can confirm is closed or shut down through a public source (a DOJ press release, a company's own closure notice, credible reporting), or a company that has received a publicly posted FDA warning letter. We don't list a vendor as a scam based on rumor, a low review score, or a competitor's claim. If we can't link a public record, it isn't on this page.

I think a vendor not listed here is behaving suspiciously. What should I do?+

Report it directly: FDA MedWatch for product-safety or quality concerns, FTC ReportFraud.gov for suspected fraud or an unfulfilled order. Those are the agencies with authority to investigate and act. We update this page only once a public record exists, so it will always lag an active investigation.

Related: vendor red-flags checklist · COA checker tool · our scoring methodology